SendToTeam vs Sintra AI
Both offer AI employees — here's how they differ.
| Feature | SendToTeam | Sintra AI |
|---|---|---|
| AI employees with roles & names | ||
| Natural language delegation | ||
| Human approval before delivery | ||
| Persistent employee memory | Limited | |
| Desktop app | ||
| Custom routines & schedules | Limited | |
| Transparent pricing (payroll model) | ||
| Open employee catalog | ||
| Multi-employee coordination | Limited | |
| Developer integrations (GitHub, Linear) |
Similar concept, different execution
Both SendToTeam and Sintra AI use the "AI employee" metaphor. You hire AI workers by role and delegate tasks to them. But the execution differs significantly.
Where SendToTeam differs
Approval-first workflow. Every piece of work an AI employee produces goes through your Approvals Desk before it ships. This isn't optional — it's the core of how SendToTeam works. You maintain full control over what goes out.
Transparent payroll pricing. SendToTeam uses a straightforward payroll model. Each employee has a clear monthly salary, and your plan determines how many you can hire. No hidden token costs or usage-based surprises.
Developer-grade integrations. SendToTeam connects to tools like GitHub and Linear, making it suitable for technical founders — not just marketing and sales use cases.
Desktop app. SendToTeam runs as a native desktop app via Tauri, with a web app for access anywhere. Your team works where you work.
Who should use what
If you want AI employees with a strong approval workflow, transparent pricing, and developer integrations, SendToTeam is built for you. If you're looking for a more marketing-focused AI assistant suite, Sintra may be worth evaluating.
Learn more about what makes an AI employee.
If you want to review everything before it goes out, SendToTeam gives you that control.